Artwork-from-emZenith-Pha-001Greetings, Whatnauts!  We hope Episode 171 finds you well, since it found us on the edge of wellness (look for the DVD marketing of Edge of Wellness to confuse everybody into thinking it’s actually called “Cough, Mute, Repeat”).  Despite our professed love of the partially muted cough or sneeze, Jeff put a lot of work into editing that out so all you get are two hours and seven minutes of pure, unfiltered comic book opinionation!  Look at the show notes below and see!Rogue00:00-10:29:  Bonus musical opening!  And then we *finally* announce the winners of our Rogue Trooper Last Man Standing contest, where the contestants told us what they would rename us if we were biochips and what piece of equipment you put us on.  Listen in as we announce the winners and read their entries because they are, as Graeme so perfectly puts it, “harsh but fair but harsh.”  Congratulations to Eric Reehl, Brendan O’Hare, Michael Loughlin, and Matthew Murray, and big thanks to Last Man Standing author and Whatnaut Brian Ruckley for making it possible for us to share the love (no matter how belatedly).

Blight-design-by-Mikel-Janin10:29-36:13: Graeme has been catching up on a bunch of old comics recently and one of them is the collected edition of DC’s Forever Evil spinoffs, and tells us about Forever Evil: Blight, a sixteen issue sub-event that starts out great and then burned through so much of Graeme’s good will, it’s kind of a shame. Also discussed: Alan Moore and American Gothic and John Constantine (and Bob and Carol and Ted and Alice); J.M. DeMatteis; DeMatteis’ run on Defenders and Captain America; Ray Fawkes; shout outs to Jesus; Jamie Delano’s Hellblazer run; Gary Seven; the Star Trek: Vanguard series; and the phrase “come through my magical portal!” which Graeme says with such panache it really does deserve to become its own meme.

Suicide_Squad_002336:13-46:33: Also read by Graeme: five or so collections of New 52’s Suicide Squad, with runs by Adam Glass, Ales Kot, and Matt Kindt on writing.  Also discussed:  the Ostrander Suicide Squad run; Charles Soule’s Thunderbolts; Thunderbolts as being overdue for a big Marvel Unlimited readthrough on Jeff’s part; Warren Ellis as muse of Marvel Comics; and an appearance by everyone’s favorite set of barking dogs, Ernie and Gus!
46:33-1:23:28:  Continued from above, but perhaps worth breaking into its own time-stamp, we talk about the idea of Marvel as a particularly American narrative, and the influence of British writers like Millar and Ellis on that narrative; Marvel’s purported distrust of The Man and its not-so-secret love of The Man; the one story Marvel can’t stop telling about SHIELD; Captain America: The Winter Soldier and the direction of the Marvel universe; the Original Sin event from Marvel (with spoilers for the final issue); Comparisons to Identity Crisis by Brad Meltzer and Rags Morales; head-scratching about what events from are “successful” and what do we mean by success, anyway?; and us talking about AXIS, Battle of the Atom, Superman: Doomed, and of course much more.
7a626333cf7b46c2274fff3b56f20f481:23:28-1:27:31: “We’ve gone horribly off-topic; how did we even get onto this?” Unsure, we turn to another set of comics Graeme tackled this week: Valiant, which Graeme especially enjoys when tackling in big chunks, as he did with Rai and Q2: The Return of Quantum and Woody, as well as new titles like Imperium and Ivar, Time Walker.
1:27:31-1:34:59: More recommendations from Graeme? “Get the fuck back into 2000 A.D.,” he advises Jeff (or perhaps it’s an oblique exorcism ritual? I didn’t realize Graeme had caught on to the fact that I was 2-D Prog demon made flesh!). And people in the U.K. he tells to go get the Judge Dredd Mega Collection by being published every fortnight by Hachette; finally, for all of us with access to a Kindle or a Kindle app, he exhorts us to purchase the omnibus of Judge Dredd: Year One novellas by Mike Carroll, Matt Smith, and Al Ewing.  So pushy, that Graeme McMillian fellow!
1:34:59-1:46:52: And, on the subject of 2000 A.D., Jeff finally got around to reading Zenith: Phase One by Grant Morrison and Steve Yeowell. So we talk about Morrison from way, way, way back in the day, what he’s doing then and what he’s doing now (such as Nameless #2 by G-Mo and Chris Burnham).
leia-1-aurebesh-1261041:46:52-1:51:55:  Jeff bought and read Princess Leia #1 by Mark Waid and Terry and Rachel Dodson and has a lot of ambivalent feelings about it (and Star Wars in general).  Listen here to find out why! (Ha, and I said Graeme was pushy.)
1:51:55-1:57:28:  Jeff also wanted to talk about Grayson #8 by Tom King, Tim Seeley, and Mikel Janin; and Scooby-Doo Team-Up #9 by Sholly Fisch and Dario Brizuela.
1:57:28-end: Shop talk! We got great feedback for our discussion on the last podcast about the first half-dozen issues of the Legion: Five Years Later.  We also wring our hands over our pace on Baxter Building, our FF readthrough podcast (protip: read issues #25-36 plus Annual #2, if you want to be prepped for our next ep!), and politely insist everyone to check out the revivified House to Astonish!  [link:  ]
and then it’s on to our closing comments! Against The Tote Bag! Places to look for us at—Stitcher! Itunes! Twitter! Tumblr! and, of course, on Patreon where, as of this count, 95 patrons make this whole thing possible.

Remember, if you do not like our audio player (and many of you do not), and you don’t like retrieving our podcast from the RSS feed or what have you, check out the very first comment for a plain text link for you to copy and paste freely!  As mentioned above, we will be back next week with Episode 3 of Baxter Building.  So if you excuse me, I have some crazy-ass Kirby/Lee comics to attend to…but, as always, thank you for listening!

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail
DE Launch page 2

Page one of the first Deathlok story…

There are some characters that are some completely of their time they somehow manage to transcend that time entirely.  Such is the case with Rich Buckler’s Deathlok The Demolisher, whose original incarnation I revisited recently thanks to a Comixology sale.  If you’re willing to accept the premise that comic books can fail at things like story and character and thematic consistency and internal logic and still be considered good, then you might find Buckler’s Deathlok to be a great comic.

(Follow me behind the jump so I don’t swamp the main page with images?) Continue reading

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail

I’ve been trying to catch up on recent Marvel series through Marvel Unlimited lately; I forget quite what the era I’m reading — the second-to-last wave of launches, basically — was called: All-New Marvel NOW!, I think? I know the most recent was Avengers NOW! and that there was also Marvel NOW! (The all-caps was, I believe, a branding decision on Marvel’s part to emphasize the now-ness of it all), but was there another one in there somewhere? I really can’t remember.

I mention this, nevertheless, because one of the good things about being so far behind is that I can read a bunch of issues on MU before making a decision one way or another on any given series: I didn’t really dig the opening issue of Magneto, say, but later issues brought me around. The first issue of She-Hulk was cute but nothing that knocked my socks off, but watching the trick repeated every issue gave the series a welcome, cumulative charm that is hard to resist. That kind of thing.

IronFist3

And then, there’s Iron Fist: The Living Weapon by Kaare Kyle Andrews, a book that is clearly a work of passion for the creator, and an unexpected flashback to a dark time for comics for me. It is, intentionally or otherwise, the most “Image Comics” comic I’ve read in years — and that includes the many titles actually being published by Image today that I pick up.

When I use that descriptor for Iron Fist, I’m neither talking about the publisher’s current output — perhaps obviously, given what I said above — nor even about the publisher itself, per se; what I’m talking about is the cliche of the comic book produced by the Image founders in their heyday. You know what I’m talking about: titles that are so visually-driven that everything about the writing is simultaneously the furthest of afterthoughts and wildly overwrought. (”His webbing — Advantageous!” indeed.) The school of comics that made Rob Liefeld a joke apparently forever more, and Jim Lee the co-publisher of DC Entertainment. Wait, maybe that was a Faustian pact or something.

IronFist1

Iron Fist, though, is so very “Image Comics” in that school that it’s surprising; it’s very much not for me — as attractive as the art may be, I can’t get over the amount of Dark Knight Returns-era Frank Miller in it to fall in love with it, and the writing is far too lacking in subtlety on every single level for me to fall for it in any way. (For those wondering what that last comment means: the story revolves around a couple of retcons to Danny Rand’s origin, while also changing Rand’s characterization entirely from where he was when we last saw him so that he becomes a more intense, cartoonishly flat figure that honestly is reminiscent of little as much as the Christian Grey that appears in the 50 Shades of Grey trailers. There’s also a return to K’Un L’Un, because that mystical kung-fu Brigadoon has to be visited in every single Iron Fist story these days, for some reason. Oh, and there’s ninjas and Danny’s dad is a bad guy, because of course he is.)

But while it not being something that I enjoy isn’t exactly a surprise, the ineptitude of it on a narrative level is. There are some bold, and utterly misguided, storytelling choices in both art and writing in the first six issues of the title that I’m surprised got past the editor, whether it’s because they’re unclear, nonsensical or merely so unsubtle as to be laughable — the “DEATH” yelling out from some panel layouts, for example, being the latter and recurring in multiple issues. Do you get it yet? DEATH. SHIT IS SERIOUS, YO. Weirdly enough, the feeling I got from these issues wasn’t that Andrews was at fault for the failings of the book, despite his being responsible for writing, drawing and colors, but that the editors were. As I said before, Iron Fist is clearly Andrews putting his heart and soul into the book, and that passion really is visible on the page — but, like the Image books it feels close to, it’s something that needed a stronger editorial hand to remind him when to pull off the throttle a bit, or perhaps reconsider some of his choices.

IronFist2

Iron Fist: The Living Weapon is something that will undoubtedly have found some fans — Miller junkies worried about how problematic he’s become in later years will find things to adore here, as will those for whom those early Image books arrived at just the right time in their childhoods — but I can’t help but feel as if the purpose it’ll serve best in the long run is reminding people of the importance of having a trusted outside eye look over things and saying, “Yeah, maybe you want to take a second swing at that.” Who would have thought that a Marvel title in today’s era would stand as a cautionary tale of too light an editorial hand?

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail

Greetings, Groovy Star-Folk!  We are back with more than two plus hours of 2-D space exploration, far past the safe, sea-shaded atmosphere of other comic book podcasts. Remember!  Below, you can find the celestial safety chart so that you may pass securely through the cosmic ray hologram we call “Wait, What? Episode One Hundred and Seventy.”  And remember, if you get lost you can always hitch a ride home on a moonbeam.  (Also, that if you just want the link to the podcast to cut and paste into the browser or player of your choice, look to our first post in our comment threads below.)

FIVE…FOUR…THREE…TWO….ONE….IGNITION…BLAST OFF:

Photo Feb 23, 12 23 43 PM

00:00-03:53: Welcome to, as Graeme puts it, “possibly our doggiest episode ever,” as he tries to record with three dogs in his office.

Photo Feb 23, 3 02 02 PM

03:53-25:57: But with that quick caveat in mind, we are pretty much off to the races as Graeme has read comp copies of Suiciders #1 by Lee Bermejo (which we punt on, since Jeff intends to read) and Black Hood #1 by Duane Swierczynski and Michael Gaydos, which Graeme compares to Bendis and Maleev’s Daredevil saying, “If you like that, you’ll like this.” With the shadow of the Powers TV show looming overhead, Jeff is a bit more interested in talking about his frustration with Bendis: comparisons to Mark Millar are uttered, original content on emerging platforms are discussed, Netflix original programming is bandied about, watching habits about same are confessed, and traditional expectations are upended. Mentioned:  Powers, Arrested Development, Orange is the New Black, and just where the hell does all the time go?

Photo Feb 23, 3 19 48 PM

25:57-45:23: And on that last point, Jeff talks about reading manga on Crunchyroll, more specifically the experience of reading 50+ chapters of Fuuka by Kouji Seo over the course of four or so days. Jeff also talks about the rapturous experience of reading 100 chapters of Masakazu Ishiguoro’s Soredemo Machi wa Mawatteiru, but really the focus here is Fuuka and how the storyline takes some, shall we say, *unconventional* turns.  SPOILERS APLENTY for Fuuka,as Jeff pretty much gives up all the plot points up until now.

Photo Feb 26, 2 12 43 PM

45:23-52:49: Jeff also bought and read all four issues of Marvel’s Night Nurse during the Marvel BOGO sale at Comixology.  Since Jeff was in the process of writing about it, Graeme doesn’t ask him about the series but instead some rather tough questions.  Questions like:  “Now that you’re read them all, would you do that again?” and “how many Kindle versions of Watchmen do you own, Jeff?” “How many print versions do you own?”  “I’m sorry, how many?”  Yes, it’s time for INTERVENTION: THE WAIT, WHAT? EDITION as Graeme and Jeff talk about owning copies of multiple books and multiple options.

Photo Feb 25, 1 52 30 PM

52:49-1:41:43: Fortunately, we don’t dwell too long on “The horror! The horror!” as the almighty Empress Audrey decreed that Graeme and I were to read the first year of Legion of Superheroes: Five Years Later by Keith Giffen, Tom and Mary Bierbaum, and Al Gordon (with editing by Mark Waid and Michael Eury).  Semi-suspect subjects that we are, we managed to get the first six issues read in time to discuss for this episode. Graeme, who has previous history with this title, gives us the context in which he first read these issues.

Photo Mar 01, 9 27 34 PM

Jeff, who only has the slightest history with the Legion, gives us his impressions as he tries to figure out what the hell is going on in those first few issues. Discussed: Giffen’s storytelling verve; the Five Years Later Legion as a reaction and development of a lot of influences in comics at the time; the FYL Legion as an early example of the flash-forward storytelling that grows in influence in late 20th and early 21st Century; the FYL Legion and Watchmen; 5YL era Giffen and modern day Kevin Huizenga; Jeff deciding that “maximialize” is a word, and is perfectly acceptable to use when making a point; issue #5 of 5YL and Mark Waid’s Empire; issues #6 of 5YL and J.J. Abrams’ Star Trek; The bicycle as a surrealist version of a leg; science-fiction names; the legacy of Paul Levitz; and much, much (much!) more.

STARMAN

1:41:43-2:02:26: On a related note, Jeff talks about a single panel he saw in his recent read of the Superman Vs. Mongul trade that he thinks explains Paul Levitz’s legacy perfectly, and how it relates to Grant Morrison. Also discussed (perhaps inevitably): James Robinson and Starman; Steve Englehart; Jim Starlin; Marvel Unlimited; and much more.
2:02:26-2:13:35:  Closing comments?  Well, you would think so, and we thought so.  But then Jeff remembers he really does have some questions he wishes to pepper Graeme about Multiversity: Mastermen by Grant Morrison and Jim Lee.  So we talk about that for close to ten minutes.
2:13:35-end:  Okay, no, really:  Closing comments!  Here’s our recording schedule (Baxter Building tip:  read issues #25-36 plus Annual #2 if you want to be current for our next podcast.) Inherent Tote Bags! Places to look for us at—Stitcher! Itunes! Twitter! Tumblr! and, of course, on Patreon where, as of this count, 95 patrons make this whole thing possible.

We’ll talk again next week!  Until then, we wish you safe re-entry!

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail
NN 1

How to Stuff a Wild Comic Book Cover!

Hey, remember that time Marvel responded to complaints about diversity and created books with people of color and women as the leads, and even hired women to write the books with the women characters?  You know, forty-three years ago, back in 1972?

Honestly? Me neither.  I was all of six then, and although I want to imagine otherwise, it looks like the comic book bug didn’t bite, infect, and rewrite my central nervous system with its own miswired genetic material until around 1974.

Nonetheless, it happened.  As explained in Sean Howe’s Marvel Comics: The Untold Story (with no small amount of rueful head-shaking):

For added authenticity (or gimmickry, depending on one’s level of cynicism), each of the three new titles was to be written by a woman.  Unfortunately, there was none presently writing for Marvel, so Thomas improvised.  He drafted his wife, Jeanie, Hulk artist Herb Trimpe’s new wife, Linda Fite, and comic conventioneer Phil Seuling’s wife, Carole.  [Stan] Lee came up with all three concepts the same day, and the titles spoke for themselves:  Night Nurse, The Claws of the Cat, and Shanna the She-Devil.  In the year of Helen Reddy’s “I Am Woman” and the launch of Ms. magazine, Marvel’s tales of candy stripers, cat-suited sexpots, and jungle queens could hardly be called revolutionary.

I adore Howe’s book, and while the skepticism here is probably appropriate, it did make me wonder.  How hard would it be to write a paragraph casting many of Marvel’s recent moves in the same light?  (For those playing at home, the answer is not hard at all.)

(More behind the jump because, of course, I do tend to go on, don’t I?) Continue reading

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail

Apparently, you can have more than one Beatles.

Okay, that’s not exactly true. But, although I compared the Lee/Kirby Fantastic Four to the Fab Four in the latest episode of Baxter Building in terms of modern audiences’ inability to fully comprehend what it would’ve been like to experience them as they were coming out for the first time — scroll down and find it for yourselves, Whatnauts — I’ve actually been struggling with a similar thing when it comes to an entirely different series recently, thanks to a long-overdue trip through Alan Moore’s (Saga of The) Swamp Thing run.

I’d read bits and pieces of this before — the opening issues at least three or four times, in ultimately-abandoned attempts to get through the series, and the “American Gothic” issues more than once as well, due to my misguided belief that Moore and my shared love of DC continuity meant we could work it out somehow — but this was the first time that I’d ever made it from start to finish, and a lot of the material was brand new to me… almost. Continue reading

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail

Previously on Baxter Building we read the first 12 issues of Fantastic Four. You can listen here if you don’t believe me.

We’re back, and despite the uneven quality of the issues we’re discussing and our health issues, surprisingly raring to go. Following the example of our first episode, this episode we’re again spending two-and-a-half hours discussing 12 of Stan Lee and Jack Kirby’s Fantastic Four (13, really; we throw in the first annual, as well). For those with very long commutes, you’re welcome. For everyone else, we’re sorry. You know the drill by now: show notes below, and for those who would rather use a podcast provider of choice, you can find the episode on Stitcher and iTunes. Strap in!

Baxter6

0:00:00-0:02:09: The theme song that never was, some introductions of sorts, and what we’re reading this time around: for those following along at home, we’re going through Fantastic Four #13-24 and Annual #1 in this episode.
0:02:10-08:12:00: Jeff and I talk about how rough this second year of the book is compared with the first. If the first year was filled with the shock of the new, the second is filled with the shock of watching two creators keep returning to the same ideas (and, in many cases, work against each other whether accidentally and otherwise). Also, I name Kirby as the author of the Fantastic Four, which I’m sure is going to upset a lot of people. Sorry!

Baxter1
0:08:13:00-0:11:28: The greatness that is Fantastic Four #13, which is notable if nothing else for the Steve Ditko inks over Jack Kirby’s pencils — which Jeff calls, entirely reasonably, “phenomenal.” We also talk about the ways in which the different inkers over the course of the next 12 issues change the look of the book dramatically.
0:11:29-0:18:54: The ways in which FF #13 just blows the earlier issues out of the water in terms of content: this isn’t just the first appearance of the Red Ghost and his Indescribable Super-Apes, but also the Watcher and the Blue Area of the Moon! It’s also the source of inspiration for Uncanny X-Men #137 many years later — and perhaps Jim Shooter’s first Secret Wars, as Jeff points out. (Trigger warning: This isn’t the only Secret Wars reference in the episode.) Also discussed: Are the Fantastic Four just apes, when it comes down to it? Is making the Red Ghost into an analog of the Invisible Girl homophobic, sexist or both? And the gloriousness of Stan and Jack’s accidental meta-narratives!

Baxter2

Baxter3
0:18:55-0:32:34: The fourteenth issue of the series is so dull that even the issue’s title sounds tired and apologetic. That said, there’s a fun (if unintentional) shout-out to the previous appearance of the Sub-Mariner as we see the growth of the FF’s celebrity in the Marvel Universe, even if they should arguably be treated with far more respect having just become the first humans to ever make it to the moon and back. Jeff also talks about the shift of the series from a monster comic to one with “a teenager’s point of view” on the world, and a conversation about the first time that you can really see Lee and Kirby visibly fight over what’s actually happening on the page, and the Sub-Mariner doesn’t want to just be friends.

Baxter5
0:32:35-0:55:11: Pop quiz, hotshots: If something isn’t animal, vegetable or mineral, what is it? Stan Lee has the answer! (Or maybe not.) Fantastic Four #15 also gets to revisit the opening of the series’ very first issue and show how they’ve all changed, and demonstrate why Stan Lee’s attempts to reposition Kirby’s very obvious ideas turn Reed into a bit of a dick, and also undermine what Lee’s trying to do in general. Plus, are arsonist organ grinder’s monkeys the new space dinosaurs, and to what extent do the Fantastic Four represent the chaos of the new disrupting the order of the old world, and just how important is human kindness to the success of the Fantastic Four (Spoilers: Very, and we’ll come back to that). All this and the secret identity of Reed Richard’s first child — and it’s not Franklin.
0:55:12-1:04:41: There are so many reasons why Fantastic Four #16 should be exciting, and we list them all, but let’s be honest: the very presence of Ant-Man — “a character on whom Stan Lee’s hyperbole does not work,” as Jeff puts it — dooms it entirely, even though he’s created Google Alerts four decades early.

Baxter7
1:04:42-1:06:42: “Scullery Maid Sue is the Hottest Sue,” says Jeff Lester. Judge for yourself, dear whatnauts — and when I say “judge,” I mean “judge Jeff for feeling that.”

BaxterSS
1:06:43-1:16:07: Fantastic Four #17 reveals the canonical connection between the Marvel Universe and the movie Weird Science, and that might be the most interesting thing about it. Has mid-run apathy hit Stan and Jack or Jeff and I? (Let’s just say that maybe some of these early issues weren’t made to be read in a large number at once.) What gets my attention, however, is the extraordinary disguise skills of Doctor Doom, and what that says about the lack of observational skills for the Fantastic Four. It’s the second issue in a row where it fails to add up to the sum of its parts, and we talk about why that happens to be. If you’ve ever wondered who the world’s greatest martial artist is, then the answer is here!

BaxterXX
1:16:08-1:26:42: One of the strangest things about Fantastic Four #18 is the oddness of seeing a Skrull — even the Super Skrull, who’s making his first appearance in this story — lifting something up while standing on the thing that he’s lifting. How…? Why…? It’s never explained, so let’s put it down to weird alien science. It’s another relatively underwhelming issue filled with goofy and fun stuff, and we identify the format rut that Lee and Kirby have fallen into so far in this run. Has our modern perspective ruined our enjoyment of these comics? Spinning off that idea, Jeff has a FF/Beatles story that’s not only enjoyable in its own right, but illustrative of a cliche that keeps popping up in these stories to date, and we go on to talk about whether or not Kirby was “ready” to tell long form stories just yet, or whether his monster comics experience is informing his pacing (both in terms of plot and visuals) too much even at this point.

BaxterSwim
1:26:43-1:36:04: What makes Fantastic Four #19 so great? For me, it’s the lack of research into spelling and the nonsensical plot resolution. For Jeff, it’s the presence of a letter from Steve Gerber (that predicts his future relationship with Marvel) and the impact that he believes this issue had on a young Chris Claremont. What’s that? A BDSM-themed issue of FF? Well… maybe not entirely, but there’s a birth of a trope here, when it comes to Marvel Comics. Also, Stan Lee’s lack of nautical knowledge is revealed in an unexpected manner, and whether or not this is the turning point for Sue Storm being given a little bit more agency.

Baxter11
1:36:05- : I really, really enjoyed Fantastic Four #20 a lot, in large part because the origin of the Molecule Man feels like something that Will Eisner had come up with for The Spirit. Meanwhile, Jeff finds a lot to say about the issue as a metaphor for the plight of the comic book artist and wonders whether that’s actually there or not. (There’s another Secret Wars reference in here.) Out of nowhere, Lee and Kirby are working together better than they have been for some issues, and the result is something rather special, with thematic connections to what’s come before… and that’s before we get to the letters page!
1:46:45-1:58:34: The first Fantastic Four Annual turns out to be the best Sub-Mariner story yet, thanks to some great narrative tricks and Kirby getting the space to stretch out, and suddenly discovering a strong sense of pacing for the first time in the FF. We also get the origin of the Atlantean race, another wonderful disguise and proof that the Fantastic Four are bad at vacations. Oh, and New York is pretty much overrun by an invading force off-panel, too. If Namor never really worked for you as a character before, this is the comic that’ll turn you around on him. No, honestly.

BaxterAnn1
1:58:35-2:07:32: What is the most horrific thing about Fantastic Four #21? Adolf Hitler as the villain? The sight of the team torn apart by hate? No, it’s George Bell’s splash page inks, because what the hell:

Baxter 12
Bell’s inks get a bit of discussion, because I am very much not a fan, but before too long, we’re discussing why this issue just doesn’t work as well as it should: how do you do Hitler vs. the FF wrong? By forgetting that your characters normally don’t like each other, apparently. Does Stan Lee get pacifism wrong? (The answer is yes.)
2:07:33-2:14:10: The Mole Man returns in Fantastic Four #22, and if that seems just a little underwhelming… it’s probably because you read the issue as well. On the plus side, Sue Storm gets more to do — Reed tells her to, obviously, because female agency isn’t a thing just yet! — and there’re more letters page names that you might remember.

Baxter13
2:14:11-2:21:50: We’re closing in on the end of the episode, so we rush right into Fantastic Four #23, which is the all-too-early return of Doctor Doom in such a way that just cheapens everything about the character. But there’s also the chance to see the Fantastic Four act like children, more of Stan Lee’s Alpha Male worship and the depth of which these issues influenced Jim Shooter more than anyone could have guessed.

Baxter14
2:21:51-2:29:30: Stan Lee’s hard sell for Fantastic Four #24 gives the game away about how unsuccessful this issue is, although Jeff and I have so much love for it that it surprises even us. As much as we don’t like it, it turns out that “The Infant Terrible” might be the biggest Kirby theme writ large, which means that we end up talking ourselves into loving it — despite that fact that, yet again, there’s a whiff of Secret Wars II about proceedings. I swear, this episode wasn’t sponsored by Jim Shooter. (He only pays in old Solar, Man of The Atom back issues, anyway.)

Baxter15
2:29:31-end: As Mike Nesmith once so poignantly put it, “looks like we made it to the end.” If, admittedly, an end that we had to rush to because of real-world concerns. As ever, thank you all for listening — we’re here for you on this Internet at Twitter, Tumblr and Patreon, where there are 95 brave souls making this very podcast happen.

Next week, it’s a “regular” Wait, What?, but everyone reading along should keep going with Fantastic Four in the meantime — the next Baxter Building, covering #25-36 and Annual #2, will be along before you know it. Excelsior!

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail

SUPERMAN_VS._MONGUL_TP

(Yes, I know I should do five thoughts, really, but we’re recording the second episode of Baxter Building today, and I’ve got to get caught up.)

One.  This collection of comics exists for reasons I can only guess at.  Issued in 2013, this sorta flimsy trade paperback collects DC Comics Presents issues #27-28, #36, and #43, as well as Superman Annual #11, the classic “For The Man Who Has Everything” by Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons.  Mongul, created by Len Wein and Jim Starlin, is basically the DC re-skin of Marvel’s Thanos, who is himself Jim Starlin’s analogue for DC’s Darkseid—and it says too many revelatory things about me that I eschew the mercenary zeal of someone ripping off their own rip-off when it’s someone like Rob Liefeld but exalt it when it’s Jim Starlin—so, like Thanos, Mongul is basically a guy with death’s head grin and shit-ton of muscles but also a bunch of crafty plans and tools and a tendency to start the game when he’s already at your one-yard line.

As I said, I can only guess at why this collection actually exists.  Was Mongul a thing in 2013?  Or did DC issue a trade paperback because after Marvel’s success with The Avengers, Thanos was indeed a thing and here was a chance to cash in on second hand library trade paperback curiosity?  My only-slightly-more-sensible alternate theory is that the movie Man of Steel was released in 2013 and DC needed to get a lot of Superman trade paperbacks into print and anything that at all resembled the tone of the Zack Snyder film had that much more pull of stuff that didn’t.

This thought occurred to me after reading the punch ’em up of “For The Man Who Has Everything,” where an enraged Superman cuts loose against Mongul, tearing apart a huge chunk of the Fortress of Solitude in the process.  Reading it this time around, the fight kinda reminded me of the no-holds-barred Supes-vs.-Zod finale of Man Of Steel.  You, as a reader, are supposed to be kind of terrified of it, this fight makes clear in a way the movie’s fight didn’t.

Two.  The pre-Crisis DC Universe was kind of like an old high school yearbook, one which creators and readers would sit down and flip through from time to time.  The nostalgia was part of the machinery at this point.

Well, either that, or there was a certain je ne sais Alzheimers motif going on.  I mean, in this slender trade paperback alone, check out this banner:

Congo

and this story title:

Starman

and this (unresolved) cliffhanger:

Supergirl

Throw in Alan Moore’s Whatever Happened to the Man of Tomorrow and it’s not hard to imagine the pre-Crisis DC Universe as a doddery academic type, the kind that pats down his pants pockets and wonders “Whatever happened to that idea I had for a cross-dimensional wormhole spitting out imperfect duplicates onto a planet where people could only communicate by clutching telepathic grass?”  No wonder the tone of the New52 imperiled so much distress and embarrassment?  Nobody wants to see an absent-minded academic pull on some leather pants and suddenly start talking about how *edgy* he is!

Three.  And this is how I figured out the importance of The Legion of Super-Heroes to pre-Crisis DC.  After all, the Legion are first and foremost as a bunch of kids in the far future who basically sat around and asked “Whatever happened to…” and then would go back in time to find out.

The Legion is so Ouroborian it’s a miracle they weren’t invented by Borges.  Starting out as perhaps the most brilliantly transparent shills to comic book readers ever created—they are literally a super-powered fandom—they went on to embody the perils presented by an industry populated by the fans devoted to the source material they now shepherd.

Take, for example, this collection’s reprint of DC Comics Presents #43, wherein The Legion of Super-Heroes have to help Superman defeat the combined menace of Mongul and the Sun-Eater, but not before debating whether or not in doing so they will create a time paradox:  “Jimmy Olsen has called us for help.  We have to decide if we should answer.  Should we risk upsetting the laws of time travel?” For two pages, the Legion debates helping with exactly the kind of missing-the-point commitment to exactitude that editors might debate approving the use of characters in a crossover.

It’s hard for me not to see this kind of thing as being deleterious to the story’s excitement.  At one point, Brainiac 5 points out, “we have no risk of changing the past by interfering—our history clearly shows the earth survives. We only put only our lives at hazard!” which I guess does a great job of establishing the Legion’s heroic bonafides but definitely dampens the dramatic stakes as far as the earth and sun-eating is concerned.  And yet, this kind of thing is precisely the stuff Legion fans used to chow down on before the future became its own deep cosmology and the LSH had more to do than just plot another trip in the time bubble.  “Do we dare change time?” asks The Legion, just as Paul Levitz, in writing this issue, must’ve asked himself with a shiver, “Do I dare bring back Ferro Lad?”  (Ferro Lad, who had first died protecting the future from the Sun-Eater, is actually described more thoroughly and with more complexity than Mongul.)

At the end, when Superman weeps for the death of Wildfire, it’s suggested that there are mysterious holes in Superman’s power of total recall.  (The Legion have to remind him that (a) Wildfire is just energy, and therefore can’t be killed, and (b) Wildfire is a total asshole, and nobody should be sad at the prospect of Wildfire dying.)

“Whatever Happened to Superman’s Perfect Memory?” is the question suggested by the end of DC Comics Presents #43, but it is a question for another story, another story that seems oblivious to its own obsession with obliviousness, where the only two events worth crafting a story around are the trauma of forgetting and the joy of remembering, the two strongest events for a  comic book collector, each capable of being felt with no more than the touch of a longbox.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail

Brett Ewins was never one of my favorite creators, but he was responsible for many of my favorite comics. It’s not that I didn’t enjoy his work — there’s something about his line that made his figures wonderfully flat and iconically “comic book”-y to me in a way that other creators couldn’t manage, from his Anderson, Psi Division stuff onwards — but outside of Bad Company, one of my favorite 2000AD strips of all time, his work never really appeared on anything that I fell in love with, if that makes sense.

But he did the bulk of Rogue Trooper strips when I wasn’t reading 2000AD, keeping the character around for when I’d return with Steve Dillon et al running things. And he did the first solo series for Anderson Psi Division (complete with some impressively blunt swipes from Brian Bolland’s Dredd work), another strip I’d adore after his departure — and, somewhere long after the fact, his version of Anderson has become my internal default for some reason.

And much more importantly, he was one of the creators/original editors for Deadline. I’ve spoken about this in the podcast, I think, but Deadline was one of those titles that saved me from walking away from comics when I discovered it. It was where Jamie Hewlett and Philip Bond made their names, as well as creators like Shaky Kane, Nick Abadzis, Glyn Dillon and countless others; it was where I first read Evan Dorkin and Love & Rockets, even if I didn’t quite get that latter one for years afterwards.

More than that, Deadline was a gateway to all manner of different things, for me (and, I suspect, many others; I’m fairly sure that early ‘90s comics like Revolver, with Rogan Gosh and Morrison/Hughes’ Dare come as a result of Deadline’s success, as are a bunch of Vertigo projects and so on and so on); I followed Milligan from Deadline to Shade the Changing Man. I followed Abadzis from Deadline to, years later, Laika, and Glyn Dillon even later to The Nao of Brown, all of which are some of my favorite comics ever. And I’m not sure I would have checked any of them out without Deadline. Without Brett Ewins.

(One of the strange things about Ewins’ career stalling out when it did, mostly due to illness, was that I don’t feel as if he ever really “broke through” in the U.S.; I’m imagining that many people reading this might be more familiar with his Skreemer mini-series from DC than anything else he did, which feels wrong. Without Ewins, you don’t have Gorillaz, you know?)

I never met him, I don’t think — it’s possible that I did at a Glasgow Comic Convention back in 1989 or 1990, but I don’t really remember and even if I did, I definitely wouldn’t have said anything beyond a mumbled, nervous “hello” — and he’s not even really someone that I could honest say that I’d paid a lot of attention to in recent years outside of reading, with some concern, about his health worries and run-ins with the law. (I didn’t even know The Art of Brett Ewins existed, although I now want to read it and feel ghoulish about admitting that.)

Reading about his death this morning, though, I felt both sad and grateful for everything that he’d given me, or at least helped me find, without knowing it. He might not have been a favorite creator, but he helped shape my tastes in ways that I still don’t understand.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail
BeginningImage1

Don’t worry; he looks even more like Clint Eastwood later.

Ahhh, binge-reading.  Long before people started to bragfess to losing entire weekends to Breaking Bad on Netflix, we were there: supine in our beds or our floors, bunched into the corner of the couch or the comfy chair, a huge stack of single issues or trades allowing us to melt time like it was so much wax.

Just the other day—yesterday, in fact—I found myself with two-thirds of the prerequisites for a binge-reading marathon:  I had eight hours of air travel, and I was suffering from a powerhouse of a cold, so my desire and ability to carry on conversations were  curtailed.  (Having said “two-thirds,” I realize I don’t actually know what that last prerequisite is: a relationship ending?  Sustained unemployment? A college semester with an undemanding class load?  No idea.)  I had the iPad and a ton of comics downloaded to the iPad—wait, maybe that’s the third prerequisite?—and after a certain amount of dithering around, I finally settled on one of my big post-holiday purchases, the entire Max run of Garth Ennis’ The Punisher.

(This turned out stupidly long so let’s throw this behind the jump, eh?  It’s what the long-lost primitive people of the Internet used to refer to as a Long Read.)

Continue reading

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail